Prediction of Patricia Maria Tig [215th] vs Sloane Stephens [158th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L L
Form
L L L L L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Tig 1 - 0 Stephens
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tig winning 2 and Stephens winning 0. The last match between Tig and Stephens was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 02-05-2016, Second, Clay with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | 1 |
| Sloane Stephens | 0 |
| Tig | Stats | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (11-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 215 | Ranking | 158 |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 3 |
| 30 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 23 | Titles | 10 |
| 64% (399-223) | Career Total W/L | 56% (364-282) |
| $588,976 | Career Prize Money | $14,316,941 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Sloane Stephens
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:16:32 | Average Match Time | 1:16:32 |
| 54% (28/52) | 1st Serve % | 71% (39/55) |
| 79% (22/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 67% (16/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 47% (26/55) | Return Points Win % | 27% (14/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patricia Maria Tig vs Sloane Stephens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tig 1 - 0 Stephens
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tig has won 38.9% of points on their second serve, while Stephens has won 34.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tig, in recent form, has won 51.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stephens has won 49.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.88% and 28.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tig has saved 50.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stephens has saved 52.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tig has won 75.25% of matches played (W/L 76/ 25), with Stephens winning 29.17% (W/L 7/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 263/ 115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Stephens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 129/ 75), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 15/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Tig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.27% of matches (W/L 37/ 18), where as Stephens has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 30.77% of matches (W/L 4/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tig winning 1 times and Stephens being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tig winning 2 and Stephens winning 0. The last match between Tig and Stephens was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 02-05-2016, Second, Clay with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tig and Stephens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tig winning 0 times and Stephens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tig winning 0, and Stephens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tig has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.14 while Stephens has played against players with an average rank of 133.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tig has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stephens has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tig has converted 42.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stephens has converted 52.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Patricia Maria Tig vs Sloane Stephens Best Odds For The Match
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Amina Anshba
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Ariana Geerlings
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Federica Urgesi
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emiliana Arango
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
84 of
147)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
18
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
52 of
84)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
49%
(
67 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
74 of
147)
143
Total Points Won
140
|
7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Miriana Tona
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
85)
5
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
9
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Sloane Stephens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Sloane Stephens
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
28 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Sloane Stephens
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
83%
(
52 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
108)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Sloane Stephens
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Sloane Stephens
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Sloane Stephens
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
52%
(
45 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Sloane Stephens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Sloane Stephens
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Sloane Stephens
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Tig vs Stephens?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Tig Vs Stephens is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (399/223) | Win/Loss | 56% (364/282) |
| 63% (879/520) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (825/667) |
| 56% (7023/5561) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7082/6645) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 606 | Aces Total | 869 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1787 | Total Double Faults | 1332 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:26:41 |
| 140.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 92.11 |
| 60% (14130/23637) | 1st Serve % | 67% (27739/41510) |
| 63% (8947/14130) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (17008/27739) |
| 46% (4350/9507) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6517/13769) |
| 48% (1513/3120) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2325/5055) |
| 47% (10945/23261) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18651/42066) |
| 65% (393/604) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (359/640) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 59% (73/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (77/132) |
| 51% (85/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (102/203) |
| 88% (412/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (368/307) |
| 12% (412/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (368/61) |
| 17% (208/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (278/55) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
